Too many Cooks, Kooks, Crooks and Liars.
Maybe it’s time to pare things down to the bare essentials…
Strip it to the bone.
July 22, 2015 at 8:21 am
nonncom
I agree….4 would be more than enough….16?….that’s why at a wedding reception you either get beef or chicken….people are not built to be able to choose from that many….my four, BTW, would be Rubio, Cruz, Fiarina, and Walker….sorry, Donald…
July 22, 2015 at 2:32 pm
Ming the Merciless
You leaving out the only one with guts, the one that upset the RINOs the most…
July 22, 2015 at 2:43 pm
Ming the Merciless
Imagine Trump as Prez, tossing Jane Fonda, Ketchup Kerry, Slicky and Hillzilla, Barry Hussein , Reggie Love and Mike Robinson in jail?
Well, that’s what happens when you have a Commando in the kitchen. Maybe she should actually be more commando? Apron for protection, but…
July 22, 2015 at 2:58 am
Kevin M
Female former Israeli commando with a chef’s knife? Not me pickin’ on her cooking. I’ll eat gefelte fish and ask for seconds, if that’s what she serves.
OT: Sharknado 3 is on tonight (Ann Coulter is VP…that’s as close to porn as I can deal with, and it’s got sharks and Michele Bachmann, too).
July 22, 2015 at 3:09 pm
interventor
The Dems will view a loop of Ann Coulter being eaten endlessly.
July 22, 2015 at 5:50 am
clayusmcret
There must be some benefit to running for president, even if no chance whatsoever of breaking out of the bottom tier. Otherwise, they’d stay out of it and support a candidate actually likely to win.
July 22, 2015 at 5:59 am
Bill G
Some will be humiliated by a lack of response, but none will consider it could happen to them. They will get some campaign contributions, always a bennie for a political type.
But for an up-and-coming youngster it’s a way of starting to get your name on a national stage; a way to start your path toward that goal.
I believe that is all that Obola intended in his initial campaign; I think he just intended to begin getting his name out on a national level. But when it all took off he ran with it.
July 22, 2015 at 7:43 am
eon
If you look back through history, the Dems have a track record of “out-of-nowhere” candidates ending up as POTUS. Clinton, Carter, JFK, Truman (a virtually unknown senator before becoming FDR’s “pinch-hitter” VP), Wilson, etc.
The GOP has a record of patrician “insider boys’-club” types getting the nomination on the grounds of “I’ve paid my dues and it’s my turn”. Reagan was as unpopular with the GOP leadership as he was with the Dems; he “wasn’t one of ‘us'”. And they weren’t too fond of Ike, either.
Nixon was considered a “company man” by the NE GOP establishment, and we all know how that turned out. Ford was an outlier, almost a GOP Truman, except that he got “Dewey’ed”… by another “who is this guy?” type, Carter.
The takeaway is that both sides could do a better job of opening things up for unknowns based on ability. The GOP leadership doesn’t like “outsiders”, especially conservative ones, and the Dems only want their brand of dogmatists, “outsiders” or otherwise.
Neither one serves the best interests of the American people. The question is, does either party care about that?
clear ether
eon
July 22, 2015 at 11:05 am
NotYetInACamp
The establishment of both parties does not care about the interest of the American people, nor of any except themselves.
An “out-of-nowhere” candidate provides a clean (cleaner) slate on which to draw the currently needed picture for the sheeple. It also offers an easier ability to hide the record of the candidate. Alinsyites both parties.
July 22, 2015 at 4:01 pm
B Woodman
“The GOP has a record of patrician “insider boys’-club” types getting the nomination on the grounds of “I’ve paid my dues and it’s my turn”.”
Don’t forget Bob Dole and Juan McPain in the “insider’s” list.
July 22, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Pamela
This election cycle not a sausage or groat to any of them.
Not in my budget.
July 22, 2015 at 6:00 am
Bill G
Complaints to that chef could have worse results than when you say something bad about the moose flop pie.
July 22, 2015 at 9:37 am
NotYetInACamp
Unless someone follows the US Supreme Court writings and states that all enemy combatant, their entourages and children will be deported, I will not
stand with them.
By much international law and US law, the children of invaders do not become citizens of the land that they are born on. Mexico’s presidents and the presidents of Latin nations sent their armies here to plunder us. So , too, is it a tenet of the Islamic political and Sharia structure to send an army by emigrating to conquer.
Now if we have a handle on the enemies within, those invaders are an easy call.
I dislike Trump, but even Walker has wimped out on his invader calls. And Walker knows how to win a hard political fight. I like Rand better, but I still have heard no strong words on the invasion.
trump gets it on one area alone. He will not get the nomination, but, unless someone else steps up, the candidates will suicide themselves yet again.
Concentrate on all lower offices. The we can consider impeaching whatever slave of the system gets in. That leaves a lot of RINOS that need poaching. What is the preferred load for RINO?
July 22, 2015 at 10:13 am
NotYetInACamp
I forgot to mention that this is an asymmetric war being fought against us that many here, especially the Vichy, deny exists. (RINY collaborators?) The invaders and their fellow enemy here and abroad at their home areas all say that the war is being fought hard.
July 22, 2015 at 10:55 am
Oliver Heaviside
Regarding birthright citizenship, there may be a fix. The Fourteenth Amendment says, in part,
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The key is “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”. Some legal scholars state that a baby born here to a mother who is here illegally is NOT a citizen as defined, because they are not subject to US jurisdiction.
We need to get a team of good lawyers to fight this one…
“What is the preferred load for RINO?”
BMG 50 cal. No such thing as overkill for these persistent bastards.
July 22, 2015 at 10:16 am
NotYetInACamp
Ah. The banter of the women in the kitchen while cooking is going on. I like the skill in which she avoided those two words. Very civilized and in control. Meaning sent. Politely.
July 22, 2015 at 10:49 am
Oliver Heaviside
OK, I’m stupid. What other two words?
July 22, 2015 at 11:11 am
Bill
Seems like “Bite Me” fits her attitude better. I doubt Naomi would have much patience with most of the Repub field.
July 22, 2015 at 11:34 am
NotYetInACamp
It may be the sophisticated women that I was raised with and have known well, but, look at her face. Then fill in the blanks. F O
Imagine a divine princess of a woman saying that.
Just my completely misspent life experience guess.
Please correct me if I am grossly misled by my interactions through my life. I often find that I also misinterpret some of the most basic situations. We all do. She was very polite, considering.
July 22, 2015 at 11:40 am
formwiz
What, Naomi has clothes on under her apron?
I mean, she’s all abloom these days and they let her glorious abundance go to waste?
29 Comments
Too many Cooks, Kooks, Crooks and Liars.
Maybe it’s time to pare things down to the bare essentials…
Strip it to the bone.
I agree….4 would be more than enough….16?….that’s why at a wedding reception you either get beef or chicken….people are not built to be able to choose from that many….my four, BTW, would be Rubio, Cruz, Fiarina, and Walker….sorry, Donald…
You leaving out the only one with guts, the one that upset the RINOs the most…
Imagine Trump as Prez, tossing Jane Fonda, Ketchup Kerry, Slicky and Hillzilla, Barry Hussein , Reggie Love and Mike Robinson in jail?
“Strip it to the bone.”
Oh no, I thought the Weiner saga was done.
I thought “he” would be classified with the cephlopods, the boneless, tentacled squids and octopi. No bone to strip.
He’s more of a paramecium aurelia than a glob of squish.
Well, that’s what happens when you have a Commando in the kitchen. Maybe she should actually be more commando? Apron for protection, but…
Female former Israeli commando with a chef’s knife? Not me pickin’ on her cooking. I’ll eat gefelte fish and ask for seconds, if that’s what she serves.
OT: Sharknado 3 is on tonight (Ann Coulter is VP…that’s as close to porn as I can deal with, and it’s got sharks and Michele Bachmann, too).
The Dems will view a loop of Ann Coulter being eaten endlessly.
There must be some benefit to running for president, even if no chance whatsoever of breaking out of the bottom tier. Otherwise, they’d stay out of it and support a candidate actually likely to win.
Some will be humiliated by a lack of response, but none will consider it could happen to them. They will get some campaign contributions, always a bennie for a political type.
But for an up-and-coming youngster it’s a way of starting to get your name on a national stage; a way to start your path toward that goal.
I believe that is all that Obola intended in his initial campaign; I think he just intended to begin getting his name out on a national level. But when it all took off he ran with it.
If you look back through history, the Dems have a track record of “out-of-nowhere” candidates ending up as POTUS. Clinton, Carter, JFK, Truman (a virtually unknown senator before becoming FDR’s “pinch-hitter” VP), Wilson, etc.
The GOP has a record of patrician “insider boys’-club” types getting the nomination on the grounds of “I’ve paid my dues and it’s my turn”. Reagan was as unpopular with the GOP leadership as he was with the Dems; he “wasn’t one of ‘us'”. And they weren’t too fond of Ike, either.
Nixon was considered a “company man” by the NE GOP establishment, and we all know how that turned out. Ford was an outlier, almost a GOP Truman, except that he got “Dewey’ed”… by another “who is this guy?” type, Carter.
The takeaway is that both sides could do a better job of opening things up for unknowns based on ability. The GOP leadership doesn’t like “outsiders”, especially conservative ones, and the Dems only want their brand of dogmatists, “outsiders” or otherwise.
Neither one serves the best interests of the American people. The question is, does either party care about that?
clear ether
eon
The establishment of both parties does not care about the interest of the American people, nor of any except themselves.
An “out-of-nowhere” candidate provides a clean (cleaner) slate on which to draw the currently needed picture for the sheeple. It also offers an easier ability to hide the record of the candidate. Alinsyites both parties.
“The GOP has a record of patrician “insider boys’-club” types getting the nomination on the grounds of “I’ve paid my dues and it’s my turn”.”
Don’t forget Bob Dole and Juan McPain in the “insider’s” list.
This election cycle not a sausage or groat to any of them.
Not in my budget.
Complaints to that chef could have worse results than when you say something bad about the moose flop pie.
Unless someone follows the US Supreme Court writings and states that all enemy combatant, their entourages and children will be deported, I will not
stand with them.
By much international law and US law, the children of invaders do not become citizens of the land that they are born on. Mexico’s presidents and the presidents of Latin nations sent their armies here to plunder us. So , too, is it a tenet of the Islamic political and Sharia structure to send an army by emigrating to conquer.
Now if we have a handle on the enemies within, those invaders are an easy call.
I dislike Trump, but even Walker has wimped out on his invader calls. And Walker knows how to win a hard political fight. I like Rand better, but I still have heard no strong words on the invasion.
trump gets it on one area alone. He will not get the nomination, but, unless someone else steps up, the candidates will suicide themselves yet again.
Concentrate on all lower offices. The we can consider impeaching whatever slave of the system gets in. That leaves a lot of RINOS that need poaching. What is the preferred load for RINO?
I forgot to mention that this is an asymmetric war being fought against us that many here, especially the Vichy, deny exists. (RINY collaborators?) The invaders and their fellow enemy here and abroad at their home areas all say that the war is being fought hard.
Regarding birthright citizenship, there may be a fix. The Fourteenth Amendment says, in part,
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The key is “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”. Some legal scholars state that a baby born here to a mother who is here illegally is NOT a citizen as defined, because they are not subject to US jurisdiction.
We need to get a team of good lawyers to fight this one…
“What is the preferred load for RINO?”
Silvertip. Only thing that works on blood-thirsty life-sucking vampires.
These might work:
http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/File:HellboySamaritanBullets.jpg
“What is the preferred load for RINO?”
BMG 50 cal. No such thing as overkill for these persistent bastards.
Ah. The banter of the women in the kitchen while cooking is going on. I like the skill in which she avoided those two words. Very civilized and in control. Meaning sent. Politely.
OK, I’m stupid. What other two words?
Seems like “Bite Me” fits her attitude better. I doubt Naomi would have much patience with most of the Repub field.
It may be the sophisticated women that I was raised with and have known well, but, look at her face. Then fill in the blanks. F O
Imagine a divine princess of a woman saying that.
Just my completely misspent life experience guess.
Please correct me if I am grossly misled by my interactions through my life. I often find that I also misinterpret some of the most basic situations. We all do. She was very polite, considering.
What, Naomi has clothes on under her apron?
I mean, she’s all abloom these days and they let her glorious abundance go to waste?
Who’s dressing her, Gloria Allred?
Naomi. Much prefer her brunette version.