It was most certainly a battle, just not in the traditional sense.
Up until 1/6, the swamp wasn’t afraid of us at all. We went to our little protests, cleaned up after ourselves, and left. No danger to anyone in power at all.
On 1/6, we came in such numbers that they couldn’t ignore us. We didn’t protest on the fairgrounds or the lawns of our state buildings, we went to what they consider THEIR house, and we made noise.
The provocateurs had to be there to smear us, but they were afraid before the first window was broken. That was why they had to have their agents in the crowd.
1/6 was the 2nd shot fired, and we went about it peacefully. The backlash to that should tell you all you need to know. It did us.
Bren, correct as to your last statement, not at all the first.
Call 1/6 a battle “not in the traditional sense” if you will, but in the traditional sense a battle entails armed and/or violent confrontation with a foe, and that is (unfortunately in retrospect) NOT what the march on the capitol was to be.
It was just a protest, much more peaceful than the ones carried out by the paid street thugs a year or so before that were termed that by the various Mediots and swamp dwellers. It is that “backlash” and false claims and charges that made it an “insurrection” in their minds. Bullshit.
Ready for the 3rd shot? It’s coming, and this time they can call it an insurrection or they can call it what it will be, a war for freedom and against tyranny as a new Republic is formed from the ruins of the old one.
CRA Now!
January 28, 2023 at 1:30 am
Tom Paul
Solzhenitzyn? There’s a name I have had entering my mind only a few times since the early 70s and heard spoken not at all. It’s a shame, you ask me. Thank you, Muir.
“If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?”
January 28, 2023 at 2:02 am
Buck
Probably because his last book was Two Hundred Years With the Jew. Last I checked 27 states had passed laws against saying anything about them. So there’s that.
So we send Abrams main battle tanks to Ukraine in numbers, Putin retaliates with the only thing he has — tactical nukes — and we what? Our troops overseas fighting that mess Hid’n Bid’n created, leaves us’ns home taking over the swamp with little resistance.
I never wish for nukes but it is sometimes necessary.
“Our troops overseas fighting that mess Hid’n Bid’n created, leaves us’ns home taking over the swamp with little resistance.”
The Pentagon probably has an algorithm to figure which troops are loyal to the Constitution and will commit them to overseas leaving the rest to blindly obey the generals unconditionally.
The Marxist dims figure they can’t take down armed patriots alone. So they ship out military equipment while simultaeneously fueling ww3, leaving the homeland a soft target for the ccp. And we’re complaining about crooked elections? That horse is out of the barn and over the hill. I don’t see any way we’ll ever see another fair election that “migrants” aren’t allowed to vote in, and that isn’t exactly fair is it?
Unsaid by Solzhenitsyn as he probably could not imagine it…
He focused on the response of the gov agents to the possibility of random armed resistance, but if those agents knew were faced 300 million guns in the hands of 100 million freedom fighters, what then?
It might be a different world then…hell it is a different world now, and that’s the reason those letter agency thugs will NOT be stacking up at our doors, and why their handlers so desperately want to change those numbers, but guess what? They can’t do that either without facing that same risk, as it should be.
Their approach will be much more incremental, much more focused on the weak links who cannot or will not meet them at the door with violence. Don’t be that weak link.
18 Comments
I’ll be in the barn! 😉
“More barn!” – Neil Young
1/6 was a “mostly peaceful” protest, not a battle, certainly not an insurrection.
But what is needed; what is necessary, is
“…a continuing American 1776 Revolution versus tyranny.”
Exactly right. And it will not be mostly peaceful.
CRA Now!
It was most certainly a battle, just not in the traditional sense.
Up until 1/6, the swamp wasn’t afraid of us at all. We went to our little protests, cleaned up after ourselves, and left. No danger to anyone in power at all.
On 1/6, we came in such numbers that they couldn’t ignore us. We didn’t protest on the fairgrounds or the lawns of our state buildings, we went to what they consider THEIR house, and we made noise.
The provocateurs had to be there to smear us, but they were afraid before the first window was broken. That was why they had to have their agents in the crowd.
1/6 was the 2nd shot fired, and we went about it peacefully. The backlash to that should tell you all you need to know. It did us.
Bren, correct as to your last statement, not at all the first.
Call 1/6 a battle “not in the traditional sense” if you will, but in the traditional sense a battle entails armed and/or violent confrontation with a foe, and that is (unfortunately in retrospect) NOT what the march on the capitol was to be.
It was just a protest, much more peaceful than the ones carried out by the paid street thugs a year or so before that were termed that by the various Mediots and swamp dwellers. It is that “backlash” and false claims and charges that made it an “insurrection” in their minds. Bullshit.
Ready for the 3rd shot? It’s coming, and this time they can call it an insurrection or they can call it what it will be, a war for freedom and against tyranny as a new Republic is formed from the ruins of the old one.
CRA Now!
Solzhenitzyn? There’s a name I have had entering my mind only a few times since the early 70s and heard spoken not at all. It’s a shame, you ask me. Thank you, Muir.
I quote him a fair bit, personally, but I still can’t pronounce the name.
“If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?”
Probably because his last book was Two Hundred Years With the Jew. Last I checked 27 states had passed laws against saying anything about them. So there’s that.
You can rail about, b***h at, and fantasize about how powerful and evil Da Joos are all you want. The left does it all the time.
That should tell you that the people running things definitely are not Da Joos.
The people who dream of Utopia, OTOH, have found them to be terrific scapegoats for the last three millennia at least.
clear ether
eon
So we send Abrams main battle tanks to Ukraine in numbers, Putin retaliates with the only thing he has — tactical nukes — and we what? Our troops overseas fighting that mess Hid’n Bid’n created, leaves us’ns home taking over the swamp with little resistance.
I never wish for nukes but it is sometimes necessary.
“Our troops overseas fighting that mess Hid’n Bid’n created, leaves us’ns home taking over the swamp with little resistance.”
The Pentagon probably has an algorithm to figure which troops are loyal to the Constitution and will commit them to overseas leaving the rest to blindly obey the generals unconditionally.
The Marxist dims figure they can’t take down armed patriots alone. So they ship out military equipment while simultaeneously fueling ww3, leaving the homeland a soft target for the ccp. And we’re complaining about crooked elections? That horse is out of the barn and over the hill. I don’t see any way we’ll ever see another fair election that “migrants” aren’t allowed to vote in, and that isn’t exactly fair is it?
The desire for freedom IS equality!
WAFM! How does someone think like this?
Off topic, Buyer Beware!
https://granitegrok.com/blog/2023/01/who-would-put-razor-blades-on-gas-pump-handles-i-wonder
Unsaid by Solzhenitsyn as he probably could not imagine it…
He focused on the response of the gov agents to the possibility of random armed resistance, but if those agents knew were faced 300 million guns in the hands of 100 million freedom fighters, what then?
It might be a different world then…hell it is a different world now, and that’s the reason those letter agency thugs will NOT be stacking up at our doors, and why their handlers so desperately want to change those numbers, but guess what? They can’t do that either without facing that same risk, as it should be.
Their approach will be much more incremental, much more focused on the weak links who cannot or will not meet them at the door with violence. Don’t be that weak link.
Weak link? (Another) Egg farm burns suddenly: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/01/massive-fire-mysteriously-occurs-egg-farm-connecticut/