Well, guys, we can’t have it both ways. If the illegals stay in red states, we whine that the strategy is to turn red states blue. If they end up in blue states, we whine that the strategy is to give blue states extra seats. If this situation is that much of a two-edged sword, let’s learn how to swing it ourselves.
You say that as if the government would listen and do that.
Time to follow their rules and use them against them.
Remember Harry Reid and the judicial filibuster and how that turned out…..
February 9, 2024 at 11:03 am
ULTRA-MAGA TOP DAWG JTC
“This” government…
Fuck them and their rules; they will not apply in The CRA.
A danger to it however is that the overall numbers become such that their presence and their sucking up of assets and resources impact what is available for the rebirth of the Republic.
They don’t just like their slaves, they also like having their indentured workers. The people let in under H-1B can’t quit without losing their legal status. So businesses can replace their people with foreigners that aren’t able to do anything but keep working at the low wages they came in with.
They are our replacements and the fit young men, especially the Chinese ones, will join our military to gain citizenship; a military that is unlikely to balk at firing on Americans when ordered to do so.
It wouldn’t be so bad if, in addition to joining the military, they had to pass the citizenship test. And for that matter, even the native born should be required to do the same to vote.
No more of this “New Mexico is a foreign country” idiocy.
Apportioñing’s a nitch.
Voter nullification for all those in states with actual citizens. Those voters are worth a fraction less than 1 of representation than people voting in states and districts with more illegally entered or present residents.Those ballots have a value greater than.n 1 ballot. So the invading asymmetric armies add to an areas power and representation.
Apply the law and the Constitution. Kick them out, and their babies, too.
Sooner rather than later I hope.
That would trigger a mass deportation to end all mass deportations, and quite possibly a ‘shoot on sight’ policy for those who cross between legal entry points.
Or more likely the dems would acquiesce completely and immediately to the most ludicrous of their demands to avoid seeming ‘racist’…apparently nobody knows the meaning of the word ‘illegal’ anymore, that’s the school system in a nutshell.
I checked the dictionary, the word illegal means:
‘Go the fuck home, you don’t belong here, and don’t bother applying ‘legally’ either, you’ve been permanently barred from entry, even as a tourist.’
February 9, 2024 at 8:37 am
William Henry
Anybody with a brain can see there’s war and violence coming soon to this country, people are still storing food and perishables.
Guns are still selling well and ammo demand is still way up there but the question is… How much ammo is the government laying back?
Ammo in volume is good to have, but when in use, you could evaluate the worth of the recipient. Are pilots of more worth than a local politician? A journalist vs. a national politician? All things have value in some sense. Just spit ballin’ here since the wokes think I should be killed for not agreeing with their latest craze.
Or am I worth more in prison?
Depends what list your on.
One list is immediate liquidation on the spot.
Second list is for the lifetime concentration camp…. And work won’t set you free.
Regarding the 3/5 compromise (or 1/3 if you’re Muir)
Black people have been offended by this for generations, but in a benighted way. Why weren’t they counted as full people? Yet they fail to grasp that those 3/5 folks had no rights or representation whatsoever. They were no different than livestock. The plight of slaves would have been better had they been completely ignored in the countings. The New England states didn’t get extra Congressmen because they had lots of cows. This was a power play by the slave holding agrarian states, or else they wouldn’t play. Seems like proto leftists to me, a hissy fit by the early elites.
Perhaps the Constitution was a little flawed in terms of representation apportionment; a method that took both population and land area into consideration might have worked better.
“a method that took both population and land area into consideration might have worked better”
I prefer the present system. It balances urban with rural, with Representatives by population and Senators by state, effectively giving more Senate power per person to rural Montana to balance the greater House votes elected by the higher population of California.
Taking into account population and land area, California would get both advantages.
I’m almost of the mind that voting should be restricted to property owners 35 or older, except the gov’t up here has allowed ‘migrants’ and ‘refugees’ to buy up a lot of properties at far above any reasonable value as part of a money laundering scheme they get a cut of, or to control the rental markets.
One that springs to mind is the casino worker who bought a multi-million dollar property and when challenged claimed to also be receiving a $350,000 salary for ‘online data examination’ from a company later shown to be a chinese gov’t agency, so that was just fine…and non-taxable here.
And serving or retired military or police, possibly a few others like mediacl workers except 90% of those are now immigrants with false or forged ‘qualifications’ from another country that casn’t pass the exame here but get a special dispensation to not have to.
Never get the property ownership qualification off the ground without the racism brigade destroying it.
No I was actually talking about 50 straw votes with the winner from every state forming a board to take the place of the electoral college, and the winner after three rounds of voting is prez. Eliminates the absurdity of the blue tail of the sewer cities full of vermin wagging the dog of the red states. Think the states went about 65% Trump in 2020 didn’t they?
26 Comments
Well, guys, we can’t have it both ways. If the illegals stay in red states, we whine that the strategy is to turn red states blue. If they end up in blue states, we whine that the strategy is to give blue states extra seats. If this situation is that much of a two-edged sword, let’s learn how to swing it ourselves.
Sorry Henry, that is a dumbass comment when what is necessary is to keep the fucking illegals out of all states!
You say that as if the government would listen and do that.
Time to follow their rules and use them against them.
Remember Harry Reid and the judicial filibuster and how that turned out…..
“This” government…
Fuck them and their rules; they will not apply in The CRA.
A danger to it however is that the overall numbers become such that their presence and their sucking up of assets and resources impact what is available for the rebirth of the Republic.
So ALL foreign invasion has got to be stopped!
Wasn’t it 3/5ths?
Yep, it was.
Was I 1/3 correct? heh
They don’t just like their slaves, they also like having their indentured workers. The people let in under H-1B can’t quit without losing their legal status. So businesses can replace their people with foreigners that aren’t able to do anything but keep working at the low wages they came in with.
This will not end well.
They are our replacements and the fit young men, especially the Chinese ones, will join our military to gain citizenship; a military that is unlikely to balk at firing on Americans when ordered to do so.
It wouldn’t be so bad if, in addition to joining the military, they had to pass the citizenship test. And for that matter, even the native born should be required to do the same to vote.
No more of this “New Mexico is a foreign country” idiocy.
Apportioñing’s a nitch.
Voter nullification for all those in states with actual citizens. Those voters are worth a fraction less than 1 of representation than people voting in states and districts with more illegally entered or present residents.Those ballots have a value greater than.n 1 ballot. So the invading asymmetric armies add to an areas power and representation.
Apply the law and the Constitution. Kick them out, and their babies, too.
When is our imported Tet offensive likely to strike us? Like then extraordinary acts will be required from good people of the USA.
Sooner rather than later I hope.
That would trigger a mass deportation to end all mass deportations, and quite possibly a ‘shoot on sight’ policy for those who cross between legal entry points.
Or more likely the dems would acquiesce completely and immediately to the most ludicrous of their demands to avoid seeming ‘racist’…apparently nobody knows the meaning of the word ‘illegal’ anymore, that’s the school system in a nutshell.
I checked the dictionary, the word illegal means:
‘Go the fuck home, you don’t belong here, and don’t bother applying ‘legally’ either, you’ve been permanently barred from entry, even as a tourist.’
Anybody with a brain can see there’s war and violence coming soon to this country, people are still storing food and perishables.
Guns are still selling well and ammo demand is still way up there but the question is… How much ammo is the government laying back?
At this point the Government is so corrupt we could simply bribe people and hack the inventories to hand over the Government arsenal.
Ammo in volume is good to have, but when in use, you could evaluate the worth of the recipient. Are pilots of more worth than a local politician? A journalist vs. a national politician? All things have value in some sense. Just spit ballin’ here since the wokes think I should be killed for not agreeing with their latest craze.
Or am I worth more in prison?
Depends what list your on.
One list is immediate liquidation on the spot.
Second list is for the lifetime concentration camp…. And work won’t set you free.
Even Elon recognizes and calls it out as a replacement voter scheme… https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/elon-musk-new-immigration-bill-enables-illegals-to-vote/ss-BB1i1Rxf?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=848f3cd85cad49f199001dcaf73e648a&ei=102#interstitial=6
Regarding the 3/5 compromise (or 1/3 if you’re Muir)
Black people have been offended by this for generations, but in a benighted way. Why weren’t they counted as full people? Yet they fail to grasp that those 3/5 folks had no rights or representation whatsoever. They were no different than livestock. The plight of slaves would have been better had they been completely ignored in the countings. The New England states didn’t get extra Congressmen because they had lots of cows. This was a power play by the slave holding agrarian states, or else they wouldn’t play. Seems like proto leftists to me, a hissy fit by the early elites.
Perhaps the Constitution was a little flawed in terms of representation apportionment; a method that took both population and land area into consideration might have worked better.
“a method that took both population and land area into consideration might have worked better”
I prefer the present system. It balances urban with rural, with Representatives by population and Senators by state, effectively giving more Senate power per person to rural Montana to balance the greater House votes elected by the higher population of California.
Taking into account population and land area, California would get both advantages.
Only numbers that matter; One state/one vote.
I’m almost of the mind that voting should be restricted to property owners 35 or older, except the gov’t up here has allowed ‘migrants’ and ‘refugees’ to buy up a lot of properties at far above any reasonable value as part of a money laundering scheme they get a cut of, or to control the rental markets.
One that springs to mind is the casino worker who bought a multi-million dollar property and when challenged claimed to also be receiving a $350,000 salary for ‘online data examination’ from a company later shown to be a chinese gov’t agency, so that was just fine…and non-taxable here.
And serving or retired military or police, possibly a few others like mediacl workers except 90% of those are now immigrants with false or forged ‘qualifications’ from another country that casn’t pass the exame here but get a special dispensation to not have to.
Never get the property ownership qualification off the ground without the racism brigade destroying it.
No I was actually talking about 50 straw votes with the winner from every state forming a board to take the place of the electoral college, and the winner after three rounds of voting is prez. Eliminates the absurdity of the blue tail of the sewer cities full of vermin wagging the dog of the red states. Think the states went about 65% Trump in 2020 didn’t they?