Scott Adams thinks that we will never be allowed to have a true AI by law.
The thinking is that the entire political structure is so dedicated to Gas Lighting the public that an AI that checks its own veracity, and by extension ours, would collapse the entire house of cards.
IMHO we need such an AI, not just for our sake but for the whole of mankind.
We’re fast approaching a situation where the deadly intent of delusional people, even individuals, will bring us to annihilation unless we can assure people a positive grip on an objective Truth.
This is why Elon Musk is so desperate to get us off the planet. We’ve presently got all our eggs in one basket.
‘AI’ will probably never be contained by law, some ‘judge’ somewhere will decide it has the same enduring rights as a person (with none of the responsibilities), but if someone uses it to create anti-gov’t slogans and treatises exposing corruption and malfeasance at the highest levels, then whoever programmed it or asked the questions that produced the unacceptable answer might see the inside of a DC jail cell along with the other political prisoners being held without charge.
We won’t have that problem up here, they’ll be arrested if someone says they ‘think’ they’re going to do it…
“…Discrimination is already banned under the Canadian Human Rights Act, but the new law will expand the definition of ‘discrimination’ to include online speech “likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group”. To those worrywarts who are anxious about the risk that this new law might be weaponised by woke activists, the government has said that ‘detestation’ and ‘vilification’ are not the same as ‘disdain’ or ’dislike’, which will still be permitted (thank you, Mr Trudeau), or speech that ‘discredits, humiliates, hurts or offends’.
Which raises the question: who gets to decide what speech falls foul of this new standard? And what qualifies them to make these Solomon-like judgments, parsing the difference between ‘dislike’ (acceptable) and ‘detest’ (verboten)? That job will fall to a new national agency called the Digital Safety Commission, comprised of five commissioners and an army of bureaucratic busybodies, which will have the same powers as a federal court, save for the fact that it won’t be bound by ‘any technical or legal rules of evidence’…”
They want the truth? Can we really handle the truth?
I don’t know, but this guy, our brilliant badass cornpone sheriff, will give it to you straight…the rather long article featuring Grady Judd on Epoch Times is worth the read but I can’t get the link to take. A lot of great history and future information there for us locally and nationally, but these two components are key and will be foundational going forward…how does an old born and bred Southern boy and lifetime LEO understand and teach that? But he does…please find and read the article. In the meantime…
He is launching a program to help keep the mentally ill out of jail, a chronic national urgency that defies easy solutions, while training a unit to combat the next great global crime challenge: artificial intelligence (AI).
“Right now, AI is capable of emulating voices. Right? So we’re going to have to protect the community from false AI allegations and keep evil parasites from attacking us from within as well as internationally,” he said, noting it’s the first such unit created by a local law enforcement agency in the United States.
Javier better pay attention; this right here is the real world deal when it comes to how to deal with the growing number of crazies (how many of the insane have winnower their way into our politics, our RINO’s? I can name a few…And computer intelligence, Elon may be the high-tech voice of concern and warning, but this guy is figuring out how to deal with it upfront and with the full force of the law…his law right here in our rural cow pasture laden central Florida counties.
It is better for me to see those words I have said so often represented as coming from the sources. It is calming and restful.
Veritas is good.
By the way,Skye, who is the child’s daddy? I am so forgetful.
11 Comments
Don’t know about Vito, but veritas hurts!
“Controlled opposition.” Ouch!
But wait! It says Republicans! Dodged that one!
Says Johnnie Ringo to Doc. Holiday in ‘Tombstone’
“In wine there is truth”
and Chris went far out illustrating . as usual.
(sigh)…Now if only it was real, AND could hold up in court….
If only …
Scott Adams thinks that we will never be allowed to have a true AI by law.
The thinking is that the entire political structure is so dedicated to Gas Lighting the public that an AI that checks its own veracity, and by extension ours, would collapse the entire house of cards.
IMHO we need such an AI, not just for our sake but for the whole of mankind.
We’re fast approaching a situation where the deadly intent of delusional people, even individuals, will bring us to annihilation unless we can assure people a positive grip on an objective Truth.
This is why Elon Musk is so desperate to get us off the planet. We’ve presently got all our eggs in one basket.
‘AI’ will probably never be contained by law, some ‘judge’ somewhere will decide it has the same enduring rights as a person (with none of the responsibilities), but if someone uses it to create anti-gov’t slogans and treatises exposing corruption and malfeasance at the highest levels, then whoever programmed it or asked the questions that produced the unacceptable answer might see the inside of a DC jail cell along with the other political prisoners being held without charge.
We won’t have that problem up here, they’ll be arrested if someone says they ‘think’ they’re going to do it…
“…Discrimination is already banned under the Canadian Human Rights Act, but the new law will expand the definition of ‘discrimination’ to include online speech “likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group”. To those worrywarts who are anxious about the risk that this new law might be weaponised by woke activists, the government has said that ‘detestation’ and ‘vilification’ are not the same as ‘disdain’ or ’dislike’, which will still be permitted (thank you, Mr Trudeau), or speech that ‘discredits, humiliates, hurts or offends’.
Which raises the question: who gets to decide what speech falls foul of this new standard? And what qualifies them to make these Solomon-like judgments, parsing the difference between ‘dislike’ (acceptable) and ‘detest’ (verboten)? That job will fall to a new national agency called the Digital Safety Commission, comprised of five commissioners and an army of bureaucratic busybodies, which will have the same powers as a federal court, save for the fact that it won’t be bound by ‘any technical or legal rules of evidence’…”
Well done Sir. Excellent use of the truth serum concept.
You don’t need a truth serum, only objective vision. Those truths we hold to be self evident…
They want the truth? Can we really handle the truth?
I don’t know, but this guy, our brilliant badass cornpone sheriff, will give it to you straight…the rather long article featuring Grady Judd on Epoch Times is worth the read but I can’t get the link to take. A lot of great history and future information there for us locally and nationally, but these two components are key and will be foundational going forward…how does an old born and bred Southern boy and lifetime LEO understand and teach that? But he does…please find and read the article. In the meantime…
He is launching a program to help keep the mentally ill out of jail, a chronic national urgency that defies easy solutions, while training a unit to combat the next great global crime challenge: artificial intelligence (AI).
“Right now, AI is capable of emulating voices. Right? So we’re going to have to protect the community from false AI allegations and keep evil parasites from attacking us from within as well as internationally,” he said, noting it’s the first such unit created by a local law enforcement agency in the United States.
Javier better pay attention; this right here is the real world deal when it comes to how to deal with the growing number of crazies (how many of the insane have winnower their way into our politics, our RINO’s? I can name a few…And computer intelligence, Elon may be the high-tech voice of concern and warning, but this guy is figuring out how to deal with it upfront and with the full force of the law…his law right here in our rural cow pasture laden central Florida counties.
Truth serum or not, they can’t recognize the truth even if it choked them to death while in their mouths.
It is better for me to see those words I have said so often represented as coming from the sources. It is calming and restful.
Veritas is good.
By the way,Skye, who is the child’s daddy? I am so forgetful.