President Elect Toxic Deplorable Racist SAH Neanderthal B Woodman Domestic Violent Extremist SuperStraight
Voting may be a right, but I think there should be a test for both men and women R.E. civics, Constitution, politics (local, state, national and international). That would weed out a lot of the DildoCrats, and RINOs; both men and women.
But if I advocate that, some damned fool is going to jump up and start spouting off about administering a test to be able to buy and carry guns.
So maybe my good idea isn’t such a good idea after all.
Actually, I think I need to go back and re-read my pocket copy of the Constitution, and find out just where and what it sez about voting. Hmmmmm……..
These statements always puzzle me. On what planet do you guys live?
Who do you think is going to develop and review such tests? Yeah. Lobsta Girl and Occasional-Cortex respectively, or someone like them. Enjoy your Critical Race Theory exams.
A Pauper’s Oath.
Make it a requirement to take a Pauper’s Oath before receiving Welfare, Food Stamps, ect*, and said oath should legally bar the person from being eligible to vote from that moment. If the person wants to become eligible to vote once more, they have to stop reviving aforementioned government benefits and would only become eligible to vote again after four years of being off the dole.
Over here on the Left Coast, the process of legally registering to vote and actually casting a legal vote should be as easy as legally purchasing a firearm!
Sort of like the old bumper sticker: “Make Welfare As Hard To Get As A Business License”
All of our problems in California, Oregon and Washington would then be corrected in no time …
Republican’s water use will be strictly monitored ~ 2d violation is felony with automatic 5 years hard labor (practicing to work at ‘Bee’ when I grow up)
30 Comments
Feelings, nothing more than feelings….
In the four examples in the first panel is there any evidence for rational, logical thinking?
What, evil masculine logic? The current moral fashion is definitely «credo quia absurdum est».
Voting may be a right, but I think there should be a test for both men and women R.E. civics, Constitution, politics (local, state, national and international). That would weed out a lot of the DildoCrats, and RINOs; both men and women.
But if I advocate that, some damned fool is going to jump up and start spouting off about administering a test to be able to buy and carry guns.
So maybe my good idea isn’t such a good idea after all.
Actually, I think I need to go back and re-read my pocket copy of the Constitution, and find out just where and what it sez about voting. Hmmmmm……..
These statements always puzzle me. On what planet do you guys live?
Who do you think is going to develop and review such tests? Yeah. Lobsta Girl and Occasional-Cortex respectively, or someone like them. Enjoy your Critical Race Theory exams.
Smoke and Mirrors to rally the troops.
Rounds of Xanax, Midol and Estroven for the Lot of them.
Add booze to the mix for San Fran…
Totally lacking in any sort of Logic
“Why, it would be so wonderful if women ruled the world; there would be no more wars!”
Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!
Just ask Cleopatra, Messalina, Elizabeth I, Catherine the Great, Victoria…
Zar Belk!
Or Margaret Thatcher.
Women remember everything, Every thing.
When will it ever end? … When will it ever end?
The founding fathers I think said voting should be done by land / property owners only??
yes, but the updated equivalent would be citizens who produce goods and services. Producers, the people who make the country and society run.
And by extension, if you’re on welfare, no voting.
A non-working student, no voting.
Modern equivalent:
Only tax-payers should be allowed to vote – the givers vs. the takers.
I can sure get on board with that.
Not all women are nuts. Many of us are very practical, but this bunch of overgrown babies need to have a good spanking and be sent to their rooms.
Yes
A Pauper’s Oath.
Make it a requirement to take a Pauper’s Oath before receiving Welfare, Food Stamps, ect*, and said oath should legally bar the person from being eligible to vote from that moment. If the person wants to become eligible to vote once more, they have to stop reviving aforementioned government benefits and would only become eligible to vote again after four years of being off the dole.
Not a cure all, but perhaps a finger in the dike…
*Social Security benefits exempted.
What’s an “ect”?
Or did you really mean “etc”, short for “et cetera”?
Over here on the Left Coast, the process of legally registering to vote and actually casting a legal vote should be as easy as legally purchasing a firearm!
Sort of like the old bumper sticker: “Make Welfare As Hard To Get As A Business License”
All of our problems in California, Oregon and Washington would then be corrected in no time …
..any time to look at that right to vote thing?…anybody,Bueller..?
Bumper Sticker:
“Tired of Losing Yet?”
On my Christmas List for Brush clearance
https://exothermic.tech/?avad=245329_c286d1291
So that’s you, Zed, and Jack in the videos?
Need to check out this one as well for really clearing some acreage:
https://throwflame.com/
All ideas above for vetting the electorate are great, but let’s start small…
Proof of citizenship, residency, identification, and a signed trackable attachment to the secret ballot. How can even leftists not approve of that?
Because it throws a wrench into the fraud works and their rackets………………
Also causes them not to get all that secret $$$$$$
Republican’s water use will be strictly monitored ~ 2d violation is felony with automatic 5 years hard labor (practicing to work at ‘Bee’ when I grow up)
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/merrick-garland-announces-new-office-of-environmental-justice/
What the f’n f?
They want us dead and are attacking in every way from every angle.
When will we accept their declaration of war and join it?
I just spent $2,000.00 on a drone system to establish a local ISR capability. The times they are a changing.