Remember its Butt, Body, Bill, Bang with the pull thorough method. Sustained lead on those democritters is too hard, they be squirming all over the place.
Spin Drift
War Damn Eagle
Hold Fast
Molon Labe
July 19, 2015 at 10:19 pm
Big Jim
What a Weiner. Whiner. There’s got to be a rock there he can crawl back under.
Sure. Lead, and aim for the “balls”. Should be small enough to be a challanging target for those two experienced skeet shooters.
July 20, 2015 at 8:44 am
nonncom
Aim small, miss small….
July 20, 2015 at 2:17 am
Pete231
Talk about your low hangin’ fruit ! This is too easy. Put a fork in him, he’s done !
July 20, 2015 at 2:42 am
RegT
I thought this was a men’s club. WTF is this limp dick doing here, even if he was brought to provide something to shoot at? He’s not exactly a Hard Target, and he’s not likely to be successful at Surviving the Game, either.
If the men decide to allow him to live, I expect them to at least publish (on “Facebook” under the heading/hashtag #colonoscopy?) clear photos of his large colon via his own selfie-stick.
Might as well run, but you’ll only die tired. Conversion of such is not possible.
July 20, 2015 at 5:28 am
Bill G
Excellent depiction.
July 20, 2015 at 6:19 am
NotYetInACamp
If only it were that simple now.
Regular good House cleanings may have avoided this, and more.
July 20, 2015 at 7:01 am
Kip Allen
Did I catch a Firesign Theater reference?
July 20, 2015 at 10:15 am
B Woodman
Don’t know. I’m familiar with much of FT. Please quote & I’ll check the (aged, sometimes decrepit and occasionally faulty) memory banks.
July 20, 2015 at 7:09 am
Pamela
Former as in past tense, meaning no longer current.
You might have been elected previously, but were never truly a leader.
A Leader is secure in his own identity and does not need to take pictures as bait in order to lure in ego candy.
July 20, 2015 at 10:22 am
B Woodman
Correct, Lady Pamela,
The key word being “former”, NOT “representative”.
If you were truly representative of the majority of the people your district of New Yawk, AND represented EVERYBODY’S rights, you might not be the ball-less and weiner-less joke you are today.
And your muzzie-wife-of-convenience (otherwise known as a “beard”?) might not be the muff-muncher she is today. (MIND BLEACH! STAT!)
July 20, 2015 at 8:02 am
David M
A HUGE part of the problem is this one term turd (and all the others just like him/it) has a lifetime pension, and tags the damn honorific “Congresscritter” to their name like he is royalty and not just a royal Eff-Up… Grrrrr….
July 20, 2015 at 1:21 pm
capn
THIS is the part that gets my dander all in a tizzy.
They stand for office, get selected by tptb and ahem democratically elected by the unthinking, uncareing and ignorant to an office that was originally meant to be a “Post of Honor” without pay or stipend.
Dr Franklin himself warned us against paying these positions as it would … I’ll let him tell you himself >>>>
(See Benjamin Franklin address to the Constitutional Convention 1787 concerning the amendment to the Constitution to pay the Congress.)
“Sir, there are two passions which have a powerful influence in the affairs of men. These are ambitions and avarice; the love of power and the love of money. Separately, each of these has great force in prompting men to action; but when united in view of the same object, they have in many minds the most violent effects. Place before the eyes of such men a post of honor, that shall at the same time be a place of profit, and they will move heaven and earth to obtain it. The vast number of such places it is that renders the British government so tempestuous. The struggles for them are the true source of all those factions which are perpetually dividing the nation, distracting its councils, hurrying it sometimes into fruitless and mischievous wars, and often compelling a submission to dishonorable terms of peace.”
“And of what kind are the men that will strive for this profitable preeminence, through all the bustle of cabal, the heat of contention, the infinite mutual abuse of parties, tearing to pieces the best of characters? It will not be the wise and moderate, the lovers of peace and good order, the men fittest for the trust. It will be the bold and the violent, the men of strong passions and indefatigable activity in their selfish pursuits. These will thrust themselves into your government, and be your rulers. And these, too, will be mistaken in the expected happiness of their situation; for their vanquished competitors, of the same spirit, and from the same motives, will perpetually be endeavoring to distress their administration, thwart their measures, and render them odious to the people.”
“Sir, though we may set out in the beginning with moderate salaries, we shall find that such will not be of long continuance. Reasons will never be wanting for proposed augmentations; and there will always be a party for giving more to the rulers, that the rulers may be able in return to give more to them. Hence, as all history informs us, there has been in every state and kingdom a constant kind of warfare between the governing and the governed, the one striving to obtain more for its support, and the other to pay less. And this has alone occasioned great convulsions, actual civil wars, ending either in dethroning of the princes or enslaving of the people. Generally, indeed, the ruling power carries its point, and we see the revenues of princes constantly increasing, and we see that they are never satisfied, but always in want of more. The more the people are discontented with the oppression of taxes, the greater need the prince has of money to distribute among his partisans, and pay the troops that are to suppress all resistance, and enable him to plunder at pleasure.”
“There is scarce a king in a hundred who would not, if he could, follow the example of Pharaoh — get first all the people’s money, then all their lands, and then make them and their children servants forever. It will be said that we do not propose to establish kings. I know it. But there is a natural inclination in mankind to kingly government. It sometimes relieves them from aristocratic domination. They had rather have one tyrant than 500. It gives more of the appearance of equality among citizens; and that they like. I am apprehensive — therefore — perhaps too apprehensive — that the government of these states may in future times end in a monarchy. But this catastrophe, I think, may be long delayed, if in our proposed system we do not sow the seeds of contention, faction, and tumult, by making our posts of honor places of profit. If we do, I fear that, though we employ at first a number and not a single person, the number will in time be set aside; it will only nourish the fetus of a king (as the honorable gentleman from Virginia very aptly expressed it), and a king will the sooner be set over us.”
“It may be imagined by some that this is a utopian idea, and that we can never find men to serve us in the executive department without paying them well for their services. I conceive this to be a mistake. Some existing facts present themselves to me, which incline me to a contrary opinion. The high sheriff of a county in England is an honorable office, but it is not a profitable one. It is rather expensive, and therefore not sought for. But yet it is executed, and well executed, and usually by some of the principal gentlemen of the county…. I only bring the instance to show that the pleasure of doing good and serving their country, and the respect such conduct entitles them to, are sufficient motives with some minds to give up a great portion of their time to the public, without the mean inducement of pecuniary satisfaction.”
“To bring the matter nearer home, have we not seen the greatest and most important of our offices, that of general of our armies, executed for eight years together, without the smallest salary, by a patriot whom I will not now offend by any other praise; and this, through fatigues and distresses, in common with the other brave men, his military friends and companions, and the constant anxieties peculiar to his station? And shall we doubt finding three or four men in all the United States, with public spirit enough to bear sitting in peaceful council, for perhaps an equal term, merely to preside over our civil concerns, and see that our laws are duly executed? Sir, I have a better opinion of our country.
“I think we shall never be without a sufficient number of wise and good men to undertake, and execute well and faithfully, the office in question.”
“Sir, the saving of the salaries, that may at first be proposed, is not an object with me. The subsequent mischiefs of proposing them are what I apprehend. And therefore it is that I move the amendment. If it is not seconded or accepted, I must be contented with the satisfaction of having delivered my opinion frankly, and done my duty.”
And now 229 years later we have exatly what Dr Franklin feared. Parties harvesting the population for their own profit and decrying the excesses of their opponets.
Where in all of the writings of the Founding Fathers was there a reference to being a Senator or Representative for a lifetime?
Being an Elected Politician is (or was) a position of honor of serving our country not a profession.
Now were are lorded over by naught but 3P’s.
Professional. Political. Parasites.
And the other spelling for foul? Okay, fowl, as in turkey. Or dead duck.
July 20, 2015 at 9:18 am
Spin Drift
I’m gonna go there, hide the women and children. Ok now, how come nobody has yelled “Pull” on the Wiener. And another thing, other than Caitlyn “spit” most guys are born with selfie sticks. Just saying.
Spin Drift
July 20, 2015 at 10:16 am
Indiana Mike
Is it too crazy to predict that Weiner will be Mayor of NYC one day? He is the very essence of New York City.
July 20, 2015 at 10:23 am
Oliver Heaviside
Is that “lead” the verb (leed) or “lead” the metal? (led) 😎
July 20, 2015 at 11:51 am
Merle
A target that big & that slow won’t need much lead !!! 🙂
BTW, that whole “elected leader” crap, whether referring to former or current, really sticks in my craw.
Buncha bums are “hired managers” with varying tiers of responsibility. Which doesn’t reflect very well on our hiring skills does it? Maybe we should scrap this whole “democratically elected” farce, and try the hired headhunter approach as they do in the corporate world.
They could not do worse than our current approach, but if they had a thorough vetting process we might not end up with many qualified applicants.
July 20, 2015 at 12:42 pm
B Woodman
We USED to have a very good process in place, for US Senators. They were to be selected by THE STATE (a committee, the governor, the State Senate, whatever) to represent THE STATE, as a balance against the House of Representatives (elected by popular, or “democratic”, vote of the people).
Then came the 17th Amendment. And now BOTH Houses of Kongress are ELECTED by the people. The state has no balancing say in what is voted on in Kongress.
I just don’t get the idea of having Weiner at this very private and exclusive club/ranch. I understand Sam Elliott, and I understand Bill Whittle. But having Weiner there makes no sense. Yeah, a cute setup for some funny jokes, but completely illogical. I can’t rattle off a small handful of DC politicians who’d make a better and more logical choice for invite.
He’ll not rehab his reputation at the Double D, for certain. Mockery is not nearly enough for a weenie like Ol’ Carlos Dangle.
July 20, 2015 at 1:27 pm
capn
As far as the whiner is concerned … I keep wondering where the Cheney charactor is going to appear from?
“Where is a cop Cheney when you need one?”
July 20, 2015 at 3:44 pm
Dallas Halcomb
Need a decent thrower for that clay pigeon, and just bounce him along the ground like a sporting clays rabbit station. I hope Sam gets the chance to just flatten him with a knuckle sandwich for “untowards liberties”.
July 20, 2015 at 9:04 pm
billf
Maybe Naomi will be the medicine for the deviate Weiner.She could take him to the desert and hide the body.
39 Comments
Remember its Butt, Body, Bill, Bang with the pull thorough method. Sustained lead on those democritters is too hard, they be squirming all over the place.
Spin Drift
War Damn Eagle
Hold Fast
Molon Labe
What a Weiner. Whiner. There’s got to be a rock there he can crawl back under.
Quick double to low center mass, let that weasel change its name to Caitlin II and take a selfie of that.
Best clean up the house. Don’t want the Secret Service to think you keep an untidy home.
Of course, if we’d cleaned up the House earlier, you’d never have written this strip.
I don’t know what’s worse: Weiner’s sexting or his marriage to a Mohammedan….
Yeah, but Huma ain’t sleeping with Anthony, if you know what I mean and I think you do…..
Just be sure the cleaning crew wears HAZMAT gear and washes all the slime off everything he’s touched after his visit. And keep Skye away from him.
And might I say, Mr. Muir, that is an awesome caricature of the little weiner; the expression is dead on.
https://www.google.com/search?q=congressman+weiner&biw=1280&bih=602&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAmoVChMIgJm7rODoxgIVRNYeCh3ZOQvA#imgrc=pIFzH-o3iUu14M%3A
Listen up, Carlos Cockbreath;
If you start running now and get enough zigs and zags in, you might live to get to cover. If not? Lots of space out back
Who other than Anthony “Carlos Danger” Weinerschnitzle would be married to a muzzie whose breath smells like Hillary’s clam?
“selfie stick” huh?
Looks like a skeet accessory for smartphones, sure.
http://media.midwayusa.com/productimages/880×660/Primary/817/817644.jpg
Sure. Lead, and aim for the “balls”. Should be small enough to be a challanging target for those two experienced skeet shooters.
Aim small, miss small….
Talk about your low hangin’ fruit ! This is too easy. Put a fork in him, he’s done !
I thought this was a men’s club. WTF is this limp dick doing here, even if he was brought to provide something to shoot at? He’s not exactly a Hard Target, and he’s not likely to be successful at Surviving the Game, either.
If the men decide to allow him to live, I expect them to at least publish (on “Facebook” under the heading/hashtag #colonoscopy?) clear photos of his large colon via his own selfie-stick.
Entertainment value?
Might as well run, but you’ll only die tired. Conversion of such is not possible.
Excellent depiction.
If only it were that simple now.
Regular good House cleanings may have avoided this, and more.
Did I catch a Firesign Theater reference?
Don’t know. I’m familiar with much of FT. Please quote & I’ll check the (aged, sometimes decrepit and occasionally faulty) memory banks.
Former as in past tense, meaning no longer current.
You might have been elected previously, but were never truly a leader.
A Leader is secure in his own identity and does not need to take pictures as bait in order to lure in ego candy.
Correct, Lady Pamela,
The key word being “former”, NOT “representative”.
If you were truly representative of the majority of the people your district of New Yawk, AND represented EVERYBODY’S rights, you might not be the ball-less and weiner-less joke you are today.
And your muzzie-wife-of-convenience (otherwise known as a “beard”?) might not be the muff-muncher she is today. (MIND BLEACH! STAT!)
A HUGE part of the problem is this one term turd (and all the others just like him/it) has a lifetime pension, and tags the damn honorific “Congresscritter” to their name like he is royalty and not just a royal Eff-Up… Grrrrr….
THIS is the part that gets my dander all in a tizzy.
They stand for office, get selected by tptb and ahem democratically elected by the unthinking, uncareing and ignorant to an office that was originally meant to be a “Post of Honor” without pay or stipend.
Dr Franklin himself warned us against paying these positions as it would … I’ll let him tell you himself >>>>
(See Benjamin Franklin address to the Constitutional Convention 1787 concerning the amendment to the Constitution to pay the Congress.)
“Sir, there are two passions which have a powerful influence in the affairs of men. These are ambitions and avarice; the love of power and the love of money. Separately, each of these has great force in prompting men to action; but when united in view of the same object, they have in many minds the most violent effects. Place before the eyes of such men a post of honor, that shall at the same time be a place of profit, and they will move heaven and earth to obtain it. The vast number of such places it is that renders the British government so tempestuous. The struggles for them are the true source of all those factions which are perpetually dividing the nation, distracting its councils, hurrying it sometimes into fruitless and mischievous wars, and often compelling a submission to dishonorable terms of peace.”
“And of what kind are the men that will strive for this profitable preeminence, through all the bustle of cabal, the heat of contention, the infinite mutual abuse of parties, tearing to pieces the best of characters? It will not be the wise and moderate, the lovers of peace and good order, the men fittest for the trust. It will be the bold and the violent, the men of strong passions and indefatigable activity in their selfish pursuits. These will thrust themselves into your government, and be your rulers. And these, too, will be mistaken in the expected happiness of their situation; for their vanquished competitors, of the same spirit, and from the same motives, will perpetually be endeavoring to distress their administration, thwart their measures, and render them odious to the people.”
“Sir, though we may set out in the beginning with moderate salaries, we shall find that such will not be of long continuance. Reasons will never be wanting for proposed augmentations; and there will always be a party for giving more to the rulers, that the rulers may be able in return to give more to them. Hence, as all history informs us, there has been in every state and kingdom a constant kind of warfare between the governing and the governed, the one striving to obtain more for its support, and the other to pay less. And this has alone occasioned great convulsions, actual civil wars, ending either in dethroning of the princes or enslaving of the people. Generally, indeed, the ruling power carries its point, and we see the revenues of princes constantly increasing, and we see that they are never satisfied, but always in want of more. The more the people are discontented with the oppression of taxes, the greater need the prince has of money to distribute among his partisans, and pay the troops that are to suppress all resistance, and enable him to plunder at pleasure.”
“There is scarce a king in a hundred who would not, if he could, follow the example of Pharaoh — get first all the people’s money, then all their lands, and then make them and their children servants forever. It will be said that we do not propose to establish kings. I know it. But there is a natural inclination in mankind to kingly government. It sometimes relieves them from aristocratic domination. They had rather have one tyrant than 500. It gives more of the appearance of equality among citizens; and that they like. I am apprehensive — therefore — perhaps too apprehensive — that the government of these states may in future times end in a monarchy. But this catastrophe, I think, may be long delayed, if in our proposed system we do not sow the seeds of contention, faction, and tumult, by making our posts of honor places of profit. If we do, I fear that, though we employ at first a number and not a single person, the number will in time be set aside; it will only nourish the fetus of a king (as the honorable gentleman from Virginia very aptly expressed it), and a king will the sooner be set over us.”
“It may be imagined by some that this is a utopian idea, and that we can never find men to serve us in the executive department without paying them well for their services. I conceive this to be a mistake. Some existing facts present themselves to me, which incline me to a contrary opinion. The high sheriff of a county in England is an honorable office, but it is not a profitable one. It is rather expensive, and therefore not sought for. But yet it is executed, and well executed, and usually by some of the principal gentlemen of the county…. I only bring the instance to show that the pleasure of doing good and serving their country, and the respect such conduct entitles them to, are sufficient motives with some minds to give up a great portion of their time to the public, without the mean inducement of pecuniary satisfaction.”
“To bring the matter nearer home, have we not seen the greatest and most important of our offices, that of general of our armies, executed for eight years together, without the smallest salary, by a patriot whom I will not now offend by any other praise; and this, through fatigues and distresses, in common with the other brave men, his military friends and companions, and the constant anxieties peculiar to his station? And shall we doubt finding three or four men in all the United States, with public spirit enough to bear sitting in peaceful council, for perhaps an equal term, merely to preside over our civil concerns, and see that our laws are duly executed? Sir, I have a better opinion of our country.
“I think we shall never be without a sufficient number of wise and good men to undertake, and execute well and faithfully, the office in question.”
“Sir, the saving of the salaries, that may at first be proposed, is not an object with me. The subsequent mischiefs of proposing them are what I apprehend. And therefore it is that I move the amendment. If it is not seconded or accepted, I must be contented with the satisfaction of having delivered my opinion frankly, and done my duty.”
And now 229 years later we have exatly what Dr Franklin feared. Parties harvesting the population for their own profit and decrying the excesses of their opponets.
Where in all of the writings of the Founding Fathers was there a reference to being a Senator or Representative for a lifetime?
Being an Elected Politician is (or was) a position of honor of serving our country not a profession.
Now were are lorded over by naught but 3P’s.
Professional. Political. Parasites.
“Don’t forget to lead him.”
No, you have to use steel shot for foul.
What? Oh, the OTHER pronunciation of lead.
And the other spelling for foul? Okay, fowl, as in turkey. Or dead duck.
I’m gonna go there, hide the women and children. Ok now, how come nobody has yelled “Pull” on the Wiener. And another thing, other than Caitlyn “spit” most guys are born with selfie sticks. Just saying.
Spin Drift
Is it too crazy to predict that Weiner will be Mayor of NYC one day? He is the very essence of New York City.
Is that “lead” the verb (leed) or “lead” the metal? (led) 😎
A target that big & that slow won’t need much lead !!! 🙂
BTW, that whole “elected leader” crap, whether referring to former or current, really sticks in my craw.
Buncha bums are “hired managers” with varying tiers of responsibility. Which doesn’t reflect very well on our hiring skills does it? Maybe we should scrap this whole “democratically elected” farce, and try the hired headhunter approach as they do in the corporate world.
They could not do worse than our current approach, but if they had a thorough vetting process we might not end up with many qualified applicants.
We USED to have a very good process in place, for US Senators. They were to be selected by THE STATE (a committee, the governor, the State Senate, whatever) to represent THE STATE, as a balance against the House of Representatives (elected by popular, or “democratic”, vote of the people).
Then came the 17th Amendment. And now BOTH Houses of Kongress are ELECTED by the people. The state has no balancing say in what is voted on in Kongress.
I just don’t get the idea of having Weiner at this very private and exclusive club/ranch. I understand Sam Elliott, and I understand Bill Whittle. But having Weiner there makes no sense. Yeah, a cute setup for some funny jokes, but completely illogical. I can’t rattle off a small handful of DC politicians who’d make a better and more logical choice for invite.
“I *CAN* rattle off…” (sorry for the typo)
He’ll not rehab his reputation at the Double D, for certain. Mockery is not nearly enough for a weenie like Ol’ Carlos Dangle.
As far as the whiner is concerned … I keep wondering where the Cheney charactor is going to appear from?
“Where is a
copCheney when you need one?”Need a decent thrower for that clay pigeon, and just bounce him along the ground like a sporting clays rabbit station. I hope Sam gets the chance to just flatten him with a knuckle sandwich for “untowards liberties”.
Maybe Naomi will be the medicine for the deviate Weiner.She could take him to the desert and hide the body.